Legal Effectiveness and Legal Functions in Indonesia

Panggih Rangga RAHAYU; Bama ADIYANTO; Jentung Wisnu MURTI; Aries SETIYONO; Mutia Evi KRISTHY

doi:10.38142/jpls.v1i3.143

Legal Effectiveness and Legal Functions in Indonesia

Authors

Panggih Rangga RAHAYU University of Palangka Raya
Bama ADIYANTO University of Palangka Raya
Jentung Wisnu MURTI University of Palangka Raya
Aries SETIYONO University of Palangka Raya
Mutia Evi KRISTHY University of Palangka Raya

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.38142/jpls.v1i3.143

Keywords:

Law, Legal Effectiveness, Legal Function

Abstract

Purpose:
This study aims to describe the Effectiveness of Law and Legal Functions in Indonesia. Law serves as justice, certainty and expediency. In the practice of law administration in Indonesia, there are times when there is a conflict between legal certainty and justice. This research will examine the effectiveness of law and legal functions in Indonesia, based on the object of research to be studied, and then this research will be based on positive law.
Methodology:
This research uses a descriptive qualitative approach with library research methods. Legal certainty is concrete and tangible, while justice is abstract. Therefore, in solving a legal problem, the values of justice must be prioritized.
Findings:
The results of this study show that the effectiveness of law enforcement in Indonesia is influenced by several factors, namely the legal factors themselves, law enforcement factors, factors of facilities or facilities that support law enforcement, and community factors.
Implication:
The influence of law and the concept of purpose: It can be said that the concept of influence means the attitude of action or behavior associated with the rule of law in reality, a positive effect or effectiveness that depends on the purpose or purpose of the rule of law. A legal purpose is only sometimes identically stated in a rule and is not necessarily the real reason for the rule-maker.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Abdul, K. M. (1993). Hukum Perdata Indonesia. Bandung: Citra Aditya Bakti.

Abu, D. B. H. (1993). Ilmu Negara. Jakarta: Bumi Aksara.

Achmad, A. (1996). Menguak Tabir Hukum (Suatu Tinjauan Filosofis dan Sosiologis). Jakarta: Chandra Pratama.

Achmad, I. (1993). Hukum Dagang. Jakarta: Pradnya Paramita.

Achmad, S. (1997). Pengantar Ilmu Hukum dan Tata Hukum Indonesia. Bandung: Transito.

Adiyanto, B., Kristhy, M. E., Murti, J. W., & Salahidin, S. (2023). Recognition of the Existence of Traditional Legal Communities from the Perspective of Legal Philosophy. Journal of Political and Legal Sovereignty, 1(2), 72-77. https://doi.org/10.38142/jpls.v1i2.82

Friedman, L. M. (1997). Law and Society An Introduction. (New Jersey: Prentice Hall), Hlm 11-12.

Lutham, S. (1997). Penegakan Hukum dalam Konteks Sosiologi. Jurnal Hukum Ius Quia Iustum, 4(7), 57-70.

Marzuki, P. M. (2022). The Essence of Legal Research is to Resolve Legal Problems. Yuridika, 37(1), 37. https://doi.org/10.20473/ydk.v37i1.34597

Panjaitan, S. P. (1998). Dasar-Dasar Ilmu Hukum, (Asas, Pengertian, dan Sistematika). (Palembang: Universitas Sriwijaya), hlm. 57.

Prabhawisnu, A. A. G. K., Sujana, I. N., & Wesna, P. A. S. (2023). Notary Authority in Certifying Electronic Transaction Documents. Journal of Political and Legal Sovereignty, 1(1), 61-66. https://doi.org/10.38142/jpls.v1i1.64

Rahardjo, S. (1982). Hukum dan Masyarakat. Bandung: Alumni. 1982

Sitri, S. A. (1992). Pengantar Tata Hukum Indonesia. Bandung: Eresco.

Soekanto, S. (1985). Sosiologi Hukum dalam Masyarakat. Jakarta: CV. Rajawali.

Soekanto, S. (1982). Kesadaran Hukum dan Kepatuhan Hukum. (Jakarta: Rajawali), Hlm 9.

Soekanto, S. (1981). Fungsi Hukum dan Perubahan Sosial. (Bandung: Alumni), Hlm 44.

Soemitro, R. H. (1985). Studi Hukum dan Masyarakat. (Bandung: Alumni), Hlm 10-11.

Usman, S. (2009). Dasar-Dasar Sosiologi. (Yogyakarta: Pustaka Belajar), Hlm 13.