Position of the Premises in the Authentic Deed Made by the Notary
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.38142/jpls.v2i3.243Keywords:
Premises, Deeds, Authentic, NotaryAbstract
Purpose:
This research aims to analyze and examine the premises' position in an authentic deed made by a notary. It is motivated by the absence of explicit regulations regarding the premise in the Notary Position Law, even though the premise plays a vital role in explaining the background and intention of doing the deed. Legal uncertainty related to the premise can cause legal uncertainty in the practice of notary, especially in proving in court in the event of a dispute.
Methodology:
This research uses normative research methods with legislative approaches and conceptual approaches. The data used consisted of primary legal materials in the form of laws and regulations and secondary legal materials in the form of literature and scientific journals. The data collection technique was carried out through a literature study and analyzed qualitatively using the legal interpretation method with deductive reasoning.
Findings:
The results of the study show that although the position of the premise is not expressly regulated in Article 38 of the Law on the Position of Substitute Notary regarding the anatomy of the deed, in practice, notary, the premise is still used and considered necessary. The premise is generally laid after the comparison and before the content of the deed, serving as an explanation of the background, facts, and reasons for the parties to do the deed. The premise also helps notaries explore the material truth so that the deed can provide maximum legal protection.
Implication:
This research implies a need for a regulatory update in the Notary Office Law to explicitly regulate the position of the premise in the anatomy of an authentic deed. This arrangement will provide legal certainty for notaries and interested parties and strengthen the function of authentic deeds as valid and perfect evidence before the law.
Downloads
References
Abdullah, A., Wesna, P. A. S., & Utama, I. W. K. J. (2024). Legal Consequences of Polygyny Marriage Based on a Compilation of Islamic Law (Khi) and Laws on Marriage. Protection: Journal of Land and Environmental Law, 2(1), 1–10. https://doi.org/10.38142/pjlel.v2i1.1019
Adha, O. W. P., Argantos, A., Emral, E., Bahtra, R., Zarya, F., & Munir, A. (2023). Kerinci District Football Coaching Program Evaluation Innovation: CIPP Model Approach. International Journal of Social Science and Business, 7(3), 418–426. https://doi.org/10.23887/jpiundiksha.v12i3.66133
Adjie, H., & Hafidh, M. (2017). Akta Notaris untuk Perbankan Syariah. PT. Citra Aditya Bakti.
Alhamidy, F. A., & Lukman, F. A. (2023). Legalitas Penggunaan Konsep Cyber Notary Dalam Prakteknya di Indonesia. Justicia Sains: Jurnal Ilmu Hukum, 8(1), 78–96. https://doi.org/10.24967/jcs.v8i1.2304
Anggraeni, D., & Mahmudah, S. (2023). Urgensi Peningkatan Peran Notaris Melalui Implementasi Konsep Cyber Notary dalam Pembuatan Akta di Era Cyber Society 5.0. AL-MANHAJ: Jurnal Hukum Dan Pranata Sosial Islam, 5(2), 2307–2320. https://doi.org/10.37680/almanhaj.v5i2.3870
Anita, S. N. (2020). Kode Etik Sebagai Pedoman Pelaksanaan Profesi Hukum yang Baik. Jurnal Ilmiah Hukum Dirgantara, 10(2). https://doi.org/10.35968/jh.v10i2.460
Apriana, N. (2023). Kedudukan Premisse dalam Anatomi Akta Notaris. Jurnal Officium Notarium, 3(1), 49–58. https://doi.org/10.20885/JON.vol3.iss1.art6
Evangelistas, O., & Erny, D. (2021). Kedudukan Hukum Akta Notaris Dalam Rapat Umum Pemegang Saham (Rups) Melalui Telekonferensi. Palar | Pakuan Law Review, 7(2), 538–547. https://doi.org/10.33751/palar.v7i2.4503
Fatriansyah, F. (2023). Peran Majelis Pengawas Wilayah Notaris Dan Majelis Kehormatan Notaris Terhadap Pembinaan dan Pengawasan Notaris Dalam Undang-Undang Nomor 2 Tahun 2014 Tentang Perubahan Atas Undang-Undang Nomor 30 Tahun 2004 Tentang Jabatan Notaris. Legalitas: Jurnal Hukum, 14(2), 291. https://doi.org/10.33087/legalitas.v14i2.370
Habib, A. S. H. (2021). Penerapan Pasal 38 UUJN-P dalam Pelaksanaan Tugas Jabatan Notaris: Bintang Pustaka. Bintang Pustaka Madani.
Herlina, B. (2014). Dasar Teknik Pembuatan Akta Notaris. PT. Citra Aditya Bakti, Bandung.
Iriantoro, A., & Utama, I. W. K. J. (2024). Ownership of Land Ownership Rights by Traditional Villages Viewed from Indonesian Law. Protection: Journal of Land and Environmental Law, 1(3), 221–226. https://doi.org/10.38142/pjlel.v1i3.974
Korliston Sijabat, & Syaiful Khoiri Harahap. (2023). Kedudukan Fungsi Akte Notaris Dalam Perseroan Terbatas Pertanggung Jawabannya di Tinjau Dari Hukum Perdata. Yustisi, 10(1), 247–264. https://doi.org/10.32832/yustisi.v10i1.17511
Krisharyanto, E. (2005). Anatomi Suatu Perjanjian. Jurnal Perspektif, 10(1). https://doi.org/10.30742/perspektif.v10i1.520
M. Khafit Prasetyo, M. Wlidan Jumanuba, & Ayatulloh Masyhudi. (2024). Peranan Etika Profesi Notaris Sebagai Upaya Penegakan Hukum. Jurnal Ilmiah Nusantara, 1(4), 15–27. https://doi.org/10.61722/jinu.v1i4.1571
Makarim, E. (2020). Notaris dan transaksi elektronik: kajian hukum tentang cybernotary atau electronic notary.
Marbun, A. P., & Aminah. (2023). Tanggung Jawab Yuridis Notaris Dalam Penyimpanan Minuta Akta. Media Bina Ilmiah, 18(2). https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.33758/mbi.v18i2.605
Moechthar, O. (2017). Dasar-Dasar Teknik Pembuatan Akta. Airlangga University Press.
Putra, G. B. A., Dharsana, I. M. P., & Wesna, P. A. S. (2025). The Substitute Notary's Responsibility for the Deed He Made. Journal of Political and Legal Sovereignty, 2(2), 230-239. https://doi.org/10.38142/jpls.v2i2.193
Rachmadyta, F., & Wardhana, M. (2024). Perlindungan Hukum Bagi Para Penghadap Terhadap Minuta Akta Sebagai Bagian dari Protokol Notaris yang Musnah Akibat Kebakaran. Novum: Jurnal Hukum, 11(4). https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.2674/novum.v1i1.59003
Riza Rahmani, S., & Fatmawati Octarina, N. (2020). Akta Perjanjian Pengikatan Jual Beli Rumah/Rumah Susun sebagai Perlindungan Hukum bagi Penjual dan Pembeli. Jurnal Supremasi, 10(1), 36–46. https://doi.org/10.35457/supremasi.v10i1.895
Satya Wibowo, W., Najwan, J., & Abu Bakar, F. (2022). Integritas Notaris Sebagai Pejabat Pembuat Akta Autentik dalam Undang-Undang Jabatan Notaris. Recital Review, 4(2), 323–352. https://doi.org/10.22437/rr.v4i2.18861
Setiadewi, K., & Hendra Wijaya, I. M. (2020). Legalitas Akta Notaris Berbasis Cyber Notary Sebagai Akta Otentik. Jurnal Komunikasi Hukum (JKH), 6(1), 126. https://doi.org/10.23887/jkh.v6i1.23446
Soekanto, S. (2007). Penelitian Hukum Normatif: Suatu Tinjauan Singkat.
Sudjarot, A. (2022). Peran dan Kewenangan Notaris Terhadap Pendaftaran Izin Usaha Melalui Sistem Online Single Submission. Fiat Iustitia: Jurnal Hukum, 93–113. https://doi.org/10.54367/fiat.v3i1.2132
Tektona, R. I., & Wahjuni, E. (2022). Kepastian Hukum Kontrak Elektronik yang Dibuat oleh Notaris Dalam Tranksaksi E-Commerce. Jurnal Hukum Mimbar Justitia, 8(2), 267. https://doi.org/10.35194/jhmj.v8i2.2478
Theixar, R. N., & Dharmawan, N. K. S. (2021). Tanggung Jawab Notaris Dalam Menjaga Keamanan Digitalisasi Akta. Acta Comitas, 6(01), 1. https://doi.org/10.24843/AC.2021.v06.i01.p01
Yasrawan, K. T., Werastuti, D. N. S., & Sujana, E. (2023). Competitive Advantage as a Link Between the Influence of Intellectual Capital and CSR on Financial Performance. JIA (Jurnal Ilmiah Akuntansi), 8(1), 1–27. https://doi.org/10.23887/jia.v8i1.46981
Yustika Barito, I. (2023). Pertanggungjawaban Pidana Notaris Dalam Proses Pembuatan Akta Dengan Menggunakan Kesaksian Palsu. UNES Journal of Swara Justisia, 6(4), 472. https://doi.org/10.31933/ujsj.v6i4.286
ZM, Z. A. K., & Sudiro, A. (2023). Penerapan Prinsip Kehati-Hatian Sebagai Perlindungan Hukum Preventif dalam Pembuatan Akta Autentik Notaris. UNES Law Review, 6(2). https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.31933/unesrev.v6i2.1176
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Surya SUGIANA, Putu Ayu Sriasih WESNA, Anak Agung Istri AGUNG

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.