The Legitimacy of Authentic Deeds Read by a Notary via Teleconference
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.38142/jpls.v1i2.55Keywords:
Teleconfrence, Notary, LegalityAbstract
Purpose:
A notary is a public official who must provide services to the community; it is desired to be included in responding to the progress of the times, especially those related to the use of technology through teleconferences. Teleconference is a human association or association that is carried out at a far radius using electronic means.
Methodology:
The type of research used is normative legal research. The object under study is legal norms, namely related to norms contained in article 16 paragraph (1) letter (m) UUJN-P confirms that a notary must be physically present and sign the deed in the presence of appearers and witnesses. In fact, with technological advances that are very supportive, appearers and witnesses may not be physically present, for example, by holding a teleconference.
Findings:
The results of this study are that the formality of an authentic deed read by a Notary via teleconference media via video is valid and must have completed parameters related to evidence so that the norm of proof is explained, namely that a proof given at trial is valid as evidence, fulfilling all formal and material aspects.
Implication:
Regarding the deed that is permitted to use video conferencing media in the form of a general meeting of shareholders (GMS), where the parties are not required to be present at the preparation of the deed, it is enough to be replaced by someone to come to the notary. The signing of the deed in this era of digitalization has yet to have full proof.
Downloads
References
Adjie, H. (2011). Kebatalan dan Pembatalan Akta Notaris. Bandung. Refika Aditama. Hal. 37.
Azzahra, A. F. (2023, Juny 3). “Penggunaan Sarana Video Konference dalam Pembuatan Akta Notaris Dikaitkan dengan Undang-Undang Jabtan Notaris”, diakses dari scribd. com pada tanggal 03 Juni 2023 Pukul 19.53 WIB.
Barassi, T. S. (1996). The Cyber Notary: Public Key Registration and Certification and Authentication of International Legal Transactions, http://www.abanet.org/sgitech/ec/en/cybernote.html
Ibrahim, J. (2006). Teori & Metodologi Penelitian Hukum Normatif, Lebih jauh tentang berbagai pendekatan dalam penelitian hukum normatif. Cetakan Kedua, Bayumedia Publishing, hal. 300
Juwana, H. (2011). Disampaikan dalam Acara Seminar Cyber Notary, Tantangan Bagi Notaris Indonesia, Grand sahid jaya Hotel, Jakarta.
Khairandy, R. (2016). Perjanjian Jual Beli. Yogyakarta, FH UII Press, hal. 3
Kitab Undang-Undang Hukum Perdata
Makarim, E. (2012). Notaris dan Transaksi Elektronik Kajian Hukum tentang Cybernotary atau Electronic Notary. Jakarta, PT. RajaGrafindo Persada, hal. 133
Matra, A. F. (2012). Penerapan Cyber Notary di Indonesia Ditinjau dari Undang-undang Nomor 30 Tahun 2004 tentang Jabatan Notaris, Tesis, Depok
Merlyania, D. (2020). Annalisa Yahanana, Agus Trisakab, “Kewajiban Pembacaan Akta Otentik Oleh Notaris Di Hadapan Penghadap Dengan Konsep Cyber Notary”. Jurnal Ilmiah Hukum Kenotariatan
Nisp, R. O. (2021). Notaris Adalah: Pengertian, Tugas, Syarat dan Kewenangan, hal. 1. OCBC NISP
Permen Kominfo Nomor 23 Tahun 2012 Tentang Pemanfaatan Pembiayaan Teknologi Informasi dan Komunikasi
Sjahdeni, S. R. (2002). “Sistem Pengamanan E-Commerce”, Jurnal Hukm Bisnis
Sjaifurrachman. (2011). Aspek Pertanggungjawaban Notaris dalam pembuatan Akta. Bandung. Mandar Maju. Hal. 5
Undang-Undang Dasar Negara Republik Indonesia Tahun 1945
Undang-Undang Nomor 2 Tahun 2014 Tentang Perubahan Atas Undang-Undang Nomor 30 Tahun 2002 Tentang Jabatan Notaris Undang https://doi.org/10.30736/ji.v2i2.22
Undang-Undang Nomor 19 Tahun 2016 tentang Perubahan Atas Undang-Undang Nomor 11 Tahun 2008 Tentang Informasi Dan Transaksi Elektronik.
Yudara, N. G. (2015). Notari dan Permasalahannya pokok-pokok Pemikiran di Seputar Kedudukan dan Fungsi Notaris serta Akta Notaris menurut Sistem hukum Indonesia, Makalah yang disampaikan dalam Kongres INI di Jakarta.
Yulinda, D. (2012). Analisis Tanggungjawab Notaris terhadap Keabsahan Akta Pembatalan (Kasus Putusan Nomor 534/PDT.G/2008/PN.JKT.BAR Tesis, Depok: Universitas Indonesia, hal. 78.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2024 I Made Pria DHARSANA, I Nyoman SUJANA, John MADE FERRARI
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.