The Substitute Notary's Responsibility for the Deed He Made
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.38142/jpls.v2i2.193Keywords:
Substitute Notary, Responsibilities, Authentic DeedAbstract
Purpose:
A Substitute Notary is temporarily appointed as a Notary to replace a Notary who is on leave or sick. In Article 65 of the UUJNP, there is no explanation regarding the limits of the Substitute Notary's liability after his/her term ends. It is illogical because the limits of the Substitute Notary's authority end when the limits stated in his/her decision letter have expired, and he/she must still be responsible until his/her last breath.
Methodology:
The author uses a normative legal research method, legislative approach, legal concept analysis, case approach and comparative approach. The author's legal sources use primary and secondary law and tertiary legal materials. The legal collection technique uses document study techniques and recording.
Findings:
The responsibilities of a substitute notary can be divided into 4, namely: (1) Civil Liability of a Substitute Notary, (2) Criminal Liability of a Substitute Notary, and (3) Administrative Liability of a Substitute Notary. Legal protection for a substitute notary can be divided into 2: preventive legal protection and repressive protection.
Implication:
The responsibility of the Substitute Notary is only in the formal form of the authentic deed as stipulated in the law, so the Notary is not responsible for the contents of the deed. When carrying out their duties, a substitute notary will receive legal protection, including preventive legal protection to prevent disputes from occurring and repressive protection to resolve disputes that have already occurred. It is outlined in Article 66 of the UUJNP as a form of settlement effort if the notary is questioned.
Downloads
References
Adjie, H., & Gunarsa, A. (2013). Sanksi Perdata dan Administratif Terhadap Notaris sebagai Pejabat Publik.
Arifin, M. (2012). Prosedur dan Tata Cara Pembuatan Akta Autentik Notaris. Pustaka Ilmu, Jakarta.
Dalimunthe, L., Limakrisna, N., & Lusiana, L. (2023). Employee Performance Model Through Job Satisfaction: Distributive Justice and Procedural Justice at the Padang Sidempuan City Health Office. International Journal of Social Science and Business, 7(2), 397–405. https://doi.org/10.23887/ijssb.v7i2.53739
Darus, M. L. H. (2017). Hukum Notariat dan Tanggung Jawab Jabatan Notaris. UII Perss, Yogyakarta.
Faulina, J., Halim Barkatullah, A., & Gozali, D. S. (2022). Kedudukan Hukum Akta Notaris yang menerapkan Konsep Cyber Notary di Masa Pandemi Covid-19 di Indonesia. Notary Law Journal, 1(3), 247–262. https://doi.org/10.32801/nolaj.v1i3.28
Habib, A. (2022). Memahami dan Menerapkan Covernote, Legalisasi, Waarmerking dalam Pelaksanaan Tugas Jabatan Notaris. Bandung: Refika Aditama.
Hidayat, A. (2019). Perlindungan Hukum Terhadap Notaris Pengganti yang Aktanya Bermasalah Ditinjau dari Undang-Undang Nomor 30 Tahun 2004 Juncto Undang-Undang Nomor 2 Tahun 2014 Tentang Jabatan Notaris. Jurnal Minuta, 1(1), 20–27. https://doi.org/10.24123/jmta.v1i1.1840
Jozan, A. J., & Handoko, W. (2020). Eksistensi Wewenang Notaris dalam Pembuatan Akta Bidang Pertanahan. Notarius, 13(1), 181–192. https://doi.org/10.14710/nts.v13i1.29313
Martha Nur Aida, D., & Riyanto, S. (2023). Ratio Legis Pertanggung Jawaban Penerima Protokol Terhadap Isi Akta Berdasarkan Undang-Undang Jabatan Notaris. Recital Review, 5(1), 1–19. https://doi.org/10.22437/rr.v5i1.22624
Moeljanto, A.-A. H. P. (2008). Cetakan kedelapan. Rineka Cipta, Jakarta.
Nugroho, C. A. (2022). Pertanggungjawaban Notaris Pengganti Terhadap Akta-Akta Dibuatnya Yang Merugikan Pihak Ketiga. Hukum Dan Dinamika Masyarakat, 20(2), 50. https://doi.org/10.56444/hdm.v20i2.3578
Nurjanah, S. (2023). Perubahan Kedudukan Notaris Pengganti pada saat Notaris yang Diganti Meninggal Berdasarkan Undang-Undang Nomor 2 Tahun 2014. AL-MANHAJ: Jurnal Hukum Dan Pranata Sosial Islam, 5(2), 1459–1469. https://doi.org/10.37680/almanhaj.v5i2.3461
Pramono, B. A., Ramadhani, S. R., & Ovelia, A. I. K. O. (2023). Prostitution in the Context of Human Trafficking. Journal of Political and Legal Sovereignty, 1(2), 116-122. https://doi.org/10.38142/jpls.v1i2.128
Rahmawati, I. G. A. R., Budiartha, I. N. P., & Astiti, N. G. K. S. (2020). Tanggung Jawab Notaris terhadap Akta Otentik yang dibuatnya Terkait Jangka Waktu Pensiun. Jurnal Konstruksi Hukum, 1(2), 329–333. https://doi.org/10.22225/jkh.2.1.2555.329-333
Sari, R. P., Sulistyowati, E., & Sari, R. P. (2023). Determinant of Audit Forensic in Indonesia. JIA (Jurnal Ilmiah Akuntansi), 8(2), 587–606. https://doi.org/10.23887/jia.v8i2.67675
Sjaifurrachman, H. A. (2011). Aspek Pertanggungjawaban Notaris dalam Pembuatan Akta. Mandar Maju, Bandung, 252–253.
Supriyanto, I. (2022). Kajian pasal 32 Undang-Undang nomor 2 tahun 2014. Cessie: Jurnal Ilmiah Hukum, 1(1), 29–46. https://doi.org/10.55904/cessie.v1i1.186
Utama, I. W. K. J. (2022). Empowerment of Bupda Reform Access in Village Land Asset Management in Bali. Notariil Jurnal Kenotariatan, 7(1), 9–12. https://doi.org/10.22225/jn.7.1.2022.9-12
Utama, I. W. K. J., & Wiryani, M. (2023). Independent Development Model for Village Land Asset Management in Segara Kodang by Sesetan Village. Protection: Journal of Land and Environmental Law, 1(3), 198–206. https://doi.org/10.38142/pjlel.v1i3.851
Vigo, P. A., Rahmi, E., & Abu Bakar, F. (2023). Kedudukan Notaris yang Mengambil Cuti Karena diangkat Menjadi Anggota Legislatif. Recital Review, 5(1), 63–93. https://doi.org/10.22437/rr.v5i1.19105
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2024 Gede Bagus Andika PUTRA, I Made Pria DHARSANA, Putu Ayu Sriasih WESNA
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
