The Role of Judges in Realizing the Three Basic Legal Values Reviewed from Gustav Radbruch's View

Mutia Evi KRISTHY; Helmi HAMDANI; Miko SIAMIKO; Oki SANJAYA

doi:10.38142/jpls.v1i3.81

The Role of Judges in Realizing the Three Basic Legal Values Reviewed from Gustav Radbruch's View

Authors

Mutia Evi KRISTHY Palangka Raya University, Indonesia
Helmi HAMDANI Palangka Raya University, Indonesia
Miko SIAMIKO Palangka Raya University
Oki SANJAYA Palangka Raya University, Indonesia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.38142/jpls.v1i3.81

Keywords:

Judicial power, Law enforcement, Legal objectives, Basic legal values

Abstract

Purpose - Judicial power is necessary in a legal state. Judicial power functions to enforce the law by force. Forced law enforcement aims to achieve legal objectives. According to Gustav Radbruch, the law aims to fulfill a sense of justice, certainty, and benefit in living together.A
Methodology - The fundamental values of law which, according to Gustav Radbruch, include justice (philosophical), legal certainty (juridical), and benefits for society (sociological)
Findings - Gustav Radbruch's view of the three primary legal values is very important for judges in deciding cases. In realizing these values, judges should remain neutral, independent, and free and not be interfered with by political or government interests.
Implication - Officials implementing judicial power should uphold the philosophical, juridical, theological, and moral meaning of irah-irah "for the sake of justice based on belief in the Almighty God" in every decision they pronounce. Conflicts in upholding justice, expediency, and legal certainty should not make every law and decision useless for a society that believes in justice.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Arianto, H. (2012). Peranan Hakim dalam Upaya Penegakkan Hukum di Indonesia. Lex Jurnalica, 9(3), 18014.

Darmaji, S. (1998). Kedudukan Hakim dalam Ilmu dan Filsafat. (Jakarta: Mandar Maju).

Dirjosisworo, S. (1983). Pengantar Ilmu Hukum. Jakarta: PT. Raja Grafindo.

Lawrence, M. (1984). Friedmann, American Law: An Introduction, New York: W.W. Norton and Co.

Mertokusumo, M. S., & Pitlo, A. (1993). Bab-Bab Tentang Penemuan Hukum. Jakarta. Citra Aditya Bakti.

Mahawira, M. D., Arjaya, I. M., & Dharsana, I. M. P. (2023). PPAT Responsibilities That Do Not Issue the Deed of Grant of Guarantee Rights and Position of Creditors in Bankruptcy. Journal Of Politycal And Legal Sovereignty, 1(1), 30–37.

Raharjo, S. (1996). Konsep Ilmu Hukum. Citra Aditya Bakti, Bandung.

Rahardjo, S. (2006). Hukum dalam Jagat Ketertiban (Bacaan Mahasiswa Program Doktor Ilmu Hukum Universitas Diponegoro). Uki Press.

Rasjidi, L., & Putra, I. W. (1993). Hukum sebagai Suatu Sistem, Remaja Rosdakarya. Bandung: Remaja Rusdakarya.

Rato, D. (2010). Filsafat Hukum Mencari: Memahami dan Memahami Hukum. Laksbang Presindo, Yogyakarta.

Rifai, A. (2010). Penemuan Hukum oleh Hakim: Dalam Perspektif Hukum Progresif. Jakarta. Sinar Grafika.

Salman, H. O. (2010). S, Filsafat Hukum (Perkembangan & Dinamika Masalah). Bandung: PT. Refika Aditama.

Solahuddin, K. U. H. P. (2010). Kitab Undang-Undang Hukum Pidana dan KUHAP Kitab Undang-undang HUkum Acara Pidana. Jakarta: Visimedia.

Sonny, K. (1998). Etika Bisnis Tuntutan dan Relevansinya. Jakarta: Kanisius.